Purpose | Location, Sample & Measurements | Findings |
Authors |
- Determine areas of dissatisfaction
- Determine preferred nursing assistants' characteristics
|
- Midwest metropolitan area
- 3 Assisted Living Facilities
- 87 residents
- 113 family members
- Residents were interviewed; family members received a mail survey.
- Surveys included closed and open ended questions.
|
- Areas of dissatisfaction:
- Meal time - food, hours &
seating arrangement
- Nursing Assistants - turnover,
training, lack of patience and compassion
- Recreational Activities - more
& different activities
- Preferred characteristics of NAs:
- Genuine concern, kindness & patience
- Respectfulness
- Consistent attentiveness
- Pleasant disposition
|
Buelow & Fee, 1999 |
Describe residents using ALF with highest level of services |
- Nationally representative of high service;
-
- privacy ALFs
- 300 Assisted Living Facilities
- 184,558 residents
- In-person interviews
|
- Amount of control over selection of ALF:
- 52% Complete
- 23% Some Control
- 25% Little/no control
- Need more help
- 12% Dressing
- 12% Locomotion
- 26% Toileting
- Staff
- 80% treated with dignity
- 61% show affection
- 52% take time to listen
- 52% training/good supervision
- Activities:
- 45% do most or all time
- 35% not outside ALF in last 2 weeks
- 51% enjoy most/always
- Staff ask preference:
- 23% never
- 35% sometimes
|
Hawes & Phillips, 2000 |
Purpose | Location, Sample & Measurements | Findings | Authors |
| |
- Meals:
- 54% always choice
- 26% always tasty
- Extra services purchased:
- 61% grooming hair
- 26% foot care
- Information Shared
- 67% aware of monthly charge
- 30% aware of discharge policy
|
Hawes & Phillips, 2000 |
Describe death related planning and preferences for place of death among well elders in CCRCs |
- North Carolina
- Independent living apartment in 1 CCRC
- 219 residents
- Questionnaire survey, returned to researchers anonymously
|
- 40% issues re death played a role in decision to move to CCRC
- 5 themes/reasons:
- - need for terminal illness care
- - fear re: family burden
- - fear re: isolation
- - want to be near spouse
- - far from family
- 66% preferred to die on CCRC campus
- 36% apartment
- 18% in CCRC SNF
|
Hays, et al., 2001 |
Examine the amenity preferences of potential private pay nursing home residents presuming basic
services are provided. |
- Dayton, Ohio
- 2 independent living facilities
- 262 residents
- Mail survey with rating questions from most to least important
|
- Preferred amenities:
- 1-Mental & physical services
- 2-comfort & security
- 3-Personal services
- Top preferred single amenities:
- 1-Security system
- 2-Home-like environment
- 3-Private rooms
- 4-Post office services
- 5-Transportation provided
- Least Important Ratings:
- Financial consultation, fresh flowers, hospital-like environment,
gardens and educational opportunities
|
MacDowell & Clawson, 1992-3 |
Purpose | Location, Sample & Measurements | Findings | Authors |
Determine the relative importance of services, amenities & activities
in the initial selection of an ALF |
- Arkansas communities with populations of 5,000 or more
- 279 heads of households, age range from 23-83 years
- Mail survey asked importance of 43 services, facility amenities & activities
in selection of an ALF for an adult parent
|
- Top Services Preferences:
- - personal security
- - financial affordability
- - available medical facilities
- - meals available
- - personal care available
- - near adult child
- Facility amenities
- - chapel/spiritual center
- - full kitchen
- - washer & dryer in apt
|
O'Bryan, et al., 1996 |
Discover why residents leave Assisted Living Facilities (ALFs) |
- Nationally representative of American ALFs
- 278 ALFs
- 1,483 in person resident interview
- 7 months later, telephone interview with 248 residents discharged
|
- Location of residents who left ALF
- 59% nursing home
- 28% other ALF
- Reasons for leaving
- 78% need more care
- 14% closer to family
- 12% dissatisfied with care
- Decision maker:
- 75% family/resident
- 25% facility decision
- Factors impacting departures:
- - Cognitive impairment
- - Need ADL assistance
- - For profit facilities
|
Phillips, C. et al., 2003 |
Purpose | Location, Sample & Measurements | Findings | Authors |
Determine preferred characteristics of congregate care facilities by family members |
- Southeastern city
- 42 adult children who recently selected a congregate care facility for parents
- Interviews rank ordered in terms of desirability
|
- Attributes & importance ratings:
- 1 = Staff Attitudes
- 2 = Location near family
- 3 = Nursing Care
- 4 = Cost
|
Shemwell & Yavas, 1997 |
Understand consumers' satisfaction with their selection of independent-living facilities |
- Long Island, New York & Florida (affluent areas)
- Independent Living Facilities
- 204 seniors
- Interviews, with rating scales
|
- Reason for selecting facility
- 53% to be near family
- 25% to be near needed services
- 15% to be near my friends
- Factors considered important:
- 94% security on grounds
- 85% have emergency call system, access to RNs & MDs, have social activities
- Evaluated as below expectations:
- 56% emergency call system
- 43% cleanliness
- 35% caring
- Evaluated as exceeded expectations:
- 29% quietness
- 25% design of unit
- 25% caring
|
Sherman et al., 1992 |
Purpose | Location, Sample & Measurements | Findings | Authors |
Determine the relationships between resident satisfaction and organizational factors
of Assisted Living Facilities |
- Maryland
- 13 Assisted Living Facilities
- small to large size
- 119 residents interviews
- Variables - MEAP's facility amenities, costs to residents, resident characteristics,
and participation in decision concerning relocation
|
- Resident characteristics together explained most of satisfaction
- Significant characteristics:
- - personal happiness
- - high functional independence
- - participated in relocation decision
- Organizational factors added only 7% to the satisfaction
- Moderate physical amenities and personal space were the two significant variables
|
Sikorska, 1999 |
Examine decision making abilities of residents in assisted living regarding abuse and neglect |
- USA
- unknown area
- 3 ALFs
- 27 residents
- Interviews & watched video scenarios of common types of abuse, then re-interviewed
regarding abuse & strategy if it happened to them
|
- Identified about 54% of inappropriate behaviors:
- Most identified = physical, fiduciary & medication issues
- Least identified = verbal abuse, neglect and environmental hazards
- Asked how would leave if unhappy
- 51% couldn't answer
- 26% rely on family
- 22% acceptable plan without family
|
Wood & Stephens, 2003 |